Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed


Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

The National Post in its story Anti-oil sands protesters arrested at Parliament Hill rally discussed how as many as 500 people protested the Keystone XL pipeline on Parliament Hill.  (If you click on the story headline it will open in a new window so that you can check out the story and then come back to this window.)

Brigette DePape, Parliamentary page who was fired for a serious breach of protocol in June, told the crowd she was happier being with the group of activists Monday than in the House and insisted they were on the verge of forcing change “for another possible Canada.”

I’m wondering if the lights turn out, social media devices stop working, computers stop working, we have to start working the land ourselves if this will be “possible Canada” being envisioned here.  Oh well, we can just switch to other sources of energy.  We can power everything simply by solar and wind and other technology and abandon things like pipelines and fossil fuels. Right?

I am all for using other forms of technology if they are safe and do not pollute but I want there to be an honest review of reality.  Are people going to agree to paying more to do the things they want to do? Can we transition quickly to replace the traditional sources of fuel? Will many of the people protesting be prepared to make all of the sacrifices necessary to transition? Can we just put a halt on all forms of traditional initiatives such as pipelines when the population continues to grow and expect more and more pampering?

I have spoken to and known a reasonable number of people who have protested about a variety of issues in their lives.  But many of these people were always so inconsistent.  They talk the talk and walk the walk in some ways.  But at the same time when they go into Starbucks, buy their Venti Latte after classes every day and then complain about having to pay their student loans back; go on a vacation in the summer instead of working and then graduate and become a professional “opposer” of everything, I do not see them as really being sincere in their sustainability efforts when their lives in masses are not sustainable for a society.

Do do we just proceed with the status quo and do nothing?

Absolutely not.  Let’s focus on solutions though instead of always being their to “oppose.”   Let’s be consistent in all areas of our lives.  Let’s set an example of moving forward rather than simply going and screaming about everything.  Of course not everyone who is concerned about the environment and sustainability is inconsistent or not really working on solutions, but the people who often make the most amount of noise are and people turn off to this.

I remember Dr. David Suzuki speaking to Allen Gregg in an interview on TVO.  Dr. Suzuki spoke about how many in the environmental movement would become very upset with him for consulting with “big bad” firms such as Walmart. An important point that I took from Dr. Suzuki’s point was the following: You have to be able to work with these firms too.  If they are showing an interest in environmental things, don’t go after their motives, just look at the directions they are taking in these environmental initiatives and work with them.

Instead of protesting get groups of interested persons together to harness the groups creativity and entrepreneurial wherewithal to come up with the solutions and proposals.  You never know just where things might end up.

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

Artisans, community and government representatives, academics and farmers are discussing how to develop the fibre and dye industry in the region which is essentially no longer existent.

Farmers seek sustainable textile industry in N.S.. (If you click on the left text it will open in a new window so that you can check out the story and then come back to this window.)

In reality more than a quarter of the world’s supply of textiles come from China.*  Obviously textiles are typically cheaper when produced in China because of low wages, etc.  But it doesn’t stop the demand.  There are new niche markets developing but really are people going to want to pay more for products made in Canada, North America?  Some do, some more might, but pure economics are a driving force in people’s purchasing patterns, with conscience taking a back seat.

Am I being pessimistic?  Perhaps.  But I think I’m being realistic.  Places such as Nova Scotia used to produce much more textiles but that has changed.  It is interesting and a part of history.  And, if a group of enthusiasts want to get together to look at how they can support a small niche market and summon their entrepreneurial and creative spirits, then go for it.  However the article goes on to state that the “Nova Scotia government has created transition officers in the Department of Agriculture to facilitate the type of work that could result from the forum”  This means that government will be involved in some way.  Does this mean that after operations get going and if they run into financial trouble that the government will then be expected to jump in and bail them out? It might.

So what is the answer?

Again if these people want to do it with their own creativity then no problem.   I don’t think there’s anything wrong with private initiatives but government doesn’t always have to be involved.  If there’s a market, then they can do it.  There are many growing industries  in Nova Scotia such as wine production, wind energy, solar energy for hot water, etc.  Perhaps another consideration is to look at what areas are growing instead of what’s all but dead.  At the very least let’s not start out from a dependent position of requiring government support from the get go.

*http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/sustainability/projects/mass/uk_textiles.pdf 

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

NewPage Port Hawkesbury to close indefinitely – Nova Scotia.  (If you click on the left link, the story opens in a new window)

This is indeed a sad story.  Many people want the Nova Scotia government to intervene – which means dollars – to keep the operation “in operation”.  This could mean locating a buyer, etc, paying for a marketing plan.  Many people will be out of work.

Going beyond the sadness is that the reality is that the government is not always the answer.  Companies fail every day, especially US companies more than ever.

The reality is that people will likely have to retrain and move to find work.  This does not have to be all negative and self-defeating prospect.  Many opportunities can be had through retraining or going elsewhere for work. Perhaps some can muster up some entrepreneurial spirit.

But if one looks at this situation or a similar one and waits for the government to make things right – they are giving over control of their lives to others.  Never a good thing.  I hope these workers will show their independence and not spend any time waiting around.  This is a good example of showing resiliency to their children, families, and others.  Rather than perpetuating a pattern that has existed in the region for a long time, starting a new one is the answer.  Change is a reality.  One can either become left behind or move with it, adapt, and not look back.

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

Time to Debate the Death Penalty in Canada?

Watch this video and think about this issue seriously.  Regardless of where you stand I think the following is obvious.

Many victims of family members who have been killed by the most serious criminals are taunted whenever a parole hearing or Faint Hope Clause is invoked.

Canada at one time had the death penalty but in 1976 after it was abolished those who would have faced the death penalty had their sentences commuted to life sentences.    Many of those might have served a true life sentence.   This would mean that they would serve the rest of their lives in prison.

This is no longer the case.

Now a life sentence means 25 years.  Or does it? Not necessarily. When for instance, you read that someone is sentenced to 25 years without any chance of parole, this doesn’t mean they will not be released before 25 years.  They can apply for the Faint Hope Clause within 15 years.  This has now been changed by the Conservative Government but it doesn’t apply to everyone. Only “offenders who commit murder on or after the day that this legislation comes into force will no longer be able to apply to be eligible for early parole.”1

If someone is convicted of second degree murder then they would be sentenced to 25 years but they can apply for parole in 10 years.

So not only does a life sentence not really mean life, it doesn’t necessarily mean 25 years.  Notwithstanding the horrible nature of these crimes and the fact that these people will re-offend, this along with victims’ families being taunted at parole hearings might be part of the motivating reason that we have a considerable portion of the Canadian population still in favour of the death penalty.

What can be done?

1. Make a life sentence really mean life.

or at the very least,

2. Eliminate the Faint Hope Clause for everyone it might apply to.  Conservatives have done so going forward.  But it only “offenders who commit murder on or after the day that this legislation comes into force will no longer be able to apply to be eligible for early parole.”1

3. Do not allow for parole until at least after the 25 years is served.

4. Beef up the Parole Board process  to have to really utilize the information that the experts have recommended with regard to release.  Now what happens is that a team of professionals such as psychologists, psychiatrist, etc. will follow the prisoner and recommend whether he/she will likely re-offend, etc.  Often what happens is that although the experts indicate that the likelihood is very high, the parole board may still release these people.  To avoid this, if recidivism (likelihood to re-offend)  is high the person should not even get to the Parole Board, because this Board can completely ignore what the experts have said and release the person.

1. http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/news-nouv/nr-cp/2011/doc_32590.html

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

I uploaded a @YouTube video http://t.co/FAi7Z2Zw Help for Panics Attacks using Technology

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

I subscribed to MrBean’s channel on YouTube. http://t.co/2oSWTNU2

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

I favorited a @YouTube video http://t.co/nbcuLso Using Cups to Relax Muscles: Full Body Massage Therapy Tech

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

Check out this video and leave your comments.  (Don’t worry it will open up in a new window and therefore not close this page)

#mce_temp_url#

Is Canada becoming a safe haven for foreign criminals?

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

thank you very much for doing this…it was very kind…it helped me set up my (@YouTube http://t.co/z8N6jNt)

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.

@AnxietyBC Thank you for what you are doing. Some may wish to checkout
http://t.co/tRqOiuL

Don't Forget to Subscribe to our Free Newsletter - Be Truly Informed

Enter your E-mail address

We respect your privacy and use email communications in a very appropriate manner.
© 2013 Best Knowledge Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha